... you end up presenting at TechEd.
Yesterday was fun (of a sort) I ended up doing the demo section of the ESB Guidance session at TechEd. This session was scheduled to be done by Robert Hogg (Black Marble) and Ewan Fairweather (Microsoft) but Ewan had to fly home early unexpectedly on Friday morning, so leaving somewhat of a gap.
So you say, 'that is not too bad you just step in and do the prepared and scripted demo'. Well in a perfect world you would, but about 6 hours before our session was on the formal release of ESB 1.0 was posted to the MSDN site. As our demo was based on a CTP build, and as we knew the final release was somewhat different, we thought it only right to at least show the new documentation and file structures. So a hectic few hours were had by all.
I hope anyone attended the session go what they wanted out to if. I had to leave for my flight soon after the session so have heard no feedback other than the people who came to chat at the end of the session, who seemed happy. I am sure Robert will know more when he gets back, as his flight was later he had time to return to the olympian heights of the speaker lounge to once more feast upon unicorn steaks and ambrosia (well get coffee in a proper cup not a paper one at least).
As I made the mistake of not changing my TechEd speakers shirt before the flight home, not realizing the shirt made me look like a member of EasyJet staff, my outstanding question is - is there any future event in my life where the lovely grey/blue with orange trim TechEd speakers shirt is appropriate wear?
I have not been blogging much from here have I, it is not that the sessions are not that interesting, but no single item has been giving me an huge urge to write.
As I said in my last post I think this is a conference of best practice ideas and as such you tend to pick up a useful nugget here and there which you store away for future use. This is particularity relevant as at present I am reviewing our engineering process to improve our software development life cycle.
Like many companies we use a variety of tools beyond Visual Studio such as CruiseControl, nUnit and our own home grown work tracking system. I have to consider when it is advantageous to swap these for the new features in Visual Studio Team System 2008. Being pragmatic this is always going to be a slow migration, these is little point investing time in moving an old project that barely still under maintenance to a new system. In fact I have chosen to only move our active projects from our old SourceSafe based system to TFS at a major release point, e.g. V1 to V2, snap-shoting it at this point and not bothering to bring over all the change history.
The tools round the edge is another question. If you, as we do, have an investment in nUnit and CruiseControl for projects is there any good case to rework everything to MSTEST and TFS Build? In the long term I think the answer is yes, to get a unified end to end solution, but it is hard to justify the time to do an 'instant' swap over, so again it will be slow move. Especially when you can use a combined system e.g. have old testing nUnit and new ones in MSTEST pulling it all together with CruiseControl which can happily access the TFS SCC, build using MSBUILD and run all the testing frameworks.
Anyway Roy Osherove is tuning up his guitar for a session on testing to time to go....
The keynote at TechEd was as expected, we all knew about the impending release of VS2008, and still no fixed date yet (so no sausage there) and not really anything announced product wise that was not already in the blog sphere (so no real sizzle).
I think this is going to be conference on delivering on last years promises; how to get the best from the tools and technology announced last year, now that they are now really production ready and the early adopters have had a year to play with them.
My suggestion to all attendees - check the sessions with the real world experience. Due to the CTP and beta programs, there are some real experts out there on these products and many of them are presenting here (or in the audiences at the number interactive sessions).
Just come out of an interesting set of round table events for 'community influencers' at TechEd. These are people who are active in both the online and face-to-face communities from all round Europe (and Australia - the reach of TechEd Europe!) attended.
In the sessions I went to the general discussion was on the point I posted about a few weeks ago and that had been a running conversions on a number of UK blogs. I was refeshing (or sad?) to find the problems we have seen at home over attendance are the same around Europe:
- It is hard to get people to attend events in the evening
- It is hard to convert attendees to active community members
- A very small percentage of people who view online forums contribute.
As you would expect there is no single answer, and for most ideas there was someone to say 'we tried that and it did not work for us'. However, it did come out that things that fail for one group work for others - there is no silver bullet. So try anything and everything to get people engaged.
A general it was felt 'marketing presentations' do not draw people in, neither do events that cover what can be found on-line. Most people agreed that events, maybe in a panel or round table format, that provide real world experience or 'war stories' as I call them are often the ones that get the most interest. Of cause it helps if the speaker presents in an engaging style, but this is mitigated if you can get the whole room involved.
From my experience some of the most interesting community events have been to are technology agnostic and focus on general development for project management issues, notably in a group workshop style. Such as those at the Extreme Programming club, but even with this interesting content this group has struggled for number. As I said before the fact I like technology agnostic groups, as a NET developer I know there is much I can learn from Java developers and vice-versa, does not mean that this is right for all.
There was an underlying discussion of how many people in the industry were looking to the community as a means to professional development, as opposed to IT being just a job that ended at 5pm. Moving the latter group into being hard - can you engage people who have lost the 'joy for their career'?
I am sure this pre conference event will generate some online activity, keep an eye out for it.
I am now sitting in the keynote waiting for the session to start - they have graffiti artists on the stage - I wonder if it is a homarge to that great Palm Pilot handwriting text entry language?
Or is my my chance to say that that 'this keynote I could actually watch paint dry'?
Oh... the paint fumes are starting to get to me............................
What an awful journey I have had since my last post, the trip back from the USA was fine; the problems started getting from the UK to Spain. Basically fog at Liverpool stopped all flights so we had to change airline and airport to get here in time for the TechEd conference. Should have been here by noon on Sunday and actually got here nearer 9pm, so no sigh seeing for me.
Anyway registered and at the conference venue now, so let it begin.....
Seems quiet here today at the SOA conference, less people about. I wonder how many have sneaked off early for flights? It does seem to be mostly Europeans left, judging by the languages I have heard.
This does not mean parking was easy this morning, as in the same conference center Bill Gates and Bill Clinton are speaking at an MSPAC event. Now a bit of google'ing shows MSPAC is either:
- Microsoft Political Action Committee
- Resources for Ms. Pac-Man(www.mspac.com)
- Maple Syrup Producers Association of Connecticut
I really hope it is one the last two, but I doubt it.
I always thing the best thing you can bring away from conferences such as this are best practice and gotta's, to that end I saw a great session by Stephen Thomas on best practice with orchestrations, you can find his sample and slides on www.biztalkgurus.com
So that's it for the SOA conference, off to the airport now, about 12 hours at home in the UK then off to TechEd in Barcelona. Oh what a jet set life I lead.
As with all conferences you tend to flag part way through, you start to think of the flight home and not having to sit in yet another session (no matter how interesting it sound on paper). It starts to seem all sessions are either in a cold draft or tropical atmosphere. At this point I have to say I am not looking forward to another conference next week at TechEd Barcelona, I could do with a holiday! Now I am sure some will say a conference is a holiday, but I rarely find them so, holidays do not involve PowerPoint (with maybe the exception of Triathlon training camps, but many people would say they are not holidays either)
Today's sessions have given me much to think about on in a diverse set of areas, but they could all be described as bring robustness to SOA. Now this is often lumped into the term SOA Governance, a hot topic at this event.
Arguable the most important session I saw for future work I will be doing was that by Marty Waznicky on Microsoft ESB Guidance which provides patterns and practices style information and samples for best practice use of BizTalk. It in effect provides dashboards and exception catching tools (and much more) that provide SOA Governance for BizTalk and potentially any other SOA implemention. The guidance pack he (bravely) used in the session was one that was only build this morning (and should be the release version) so you can expect to see it on MSDN next week. My only complaint over this session was the volume of information he tried to cram into 1hr, at least 2hrs were needed, it must have been one of the fastest sessions I have seen at any conference. I felt dazed by about half way through and am sure I missed stuff due to the pace.
If you want to know more ESB and are going to TechEd Developer in Barcelona next week why not look in on the session being done by Robert Hogg (Black Marble) and Ewan Fairweather (Microsoft)
Running a very close second to the ESB session was the session on Web Service Software Factory by Don Smith. Again this was a session using software built today; it is the V3 version of pattern and practice guidance pack. It is tools like this that allow developers to build robust supportable web service application in VS2005 (expect to see the VS2008 early next year). I would really advice any web service developers and SOA architects to look at this new and much improved release of the PnP when it appears in the next few days.
A couple of general points to end this post on:
- If this is a business automation conference why are the session feedbacks on paper and not online forms?
- Is there some problem with the attendees of this event which means they cannot find the mute/vibrate setting for their phones and laptops? Most sessions seem to have devices going off, but nobody here seems to do the usual British practice of silent tutting and a hard stare of disapproval. Is this an American thing (acceptance of devices going off) or are all just getting blind to it in this connected broadband age?
I am off to loads of conferences and event in the next few week, you wait all year for one then they all come together.....
I aim to blog from all of them WiFi and batteries allowing