# But it works on my PC!

### The random thoughts of Richard Fennell on technology and software development

I have just done an in place upgrade on my Lenovo W520 from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10. Something I had not tried during the beta programme, sticking to running Windows 10 in VMs (mostly on Azure).

I have to say the process was pretty smooth. I only hit one issue, and this was the usual NVidia Optimus problems I saw installing Windows 8 and 8.1.

This is what happened

1. With Windows 8.1 running mounted the Windows 10 Enterprise ISO
2. Ran the setup
3. It did a few checks and eventually asked if I wanted to keep everything – I said yes
4. It showed a percentage complete gauge
1. It copied files OK (about 30%)
2. It said it had found 5% of drivers (32% overall) and stopped – I left it a couple of hours, no disk or network activity

At this point I was a bit worried. But guessed it was the same problem as I had seen on Windows 8.x; the installer needs to access the Intel GPU as well as the NVidia GPU else it gets confused and hangs. A disabled GPU is not an removed GPU.

So I

1. I rebooted (via the power switch)
2. Boot into BIOS (press the ThinkVantage button)
1. Selected the Enable Nvidia Optimus in the graphics options
2. Saved and rebooted
3. The PC rolled back the Windows 10 update (very quickly, less than 5 minutes)
Note: I had expected to be challenged for a Bitlocker code due to the BIOS setting change during the reboot but I wasn’t
4. With Windows 8.1 running again I re-mounted the Windows 10 Enterprise ISO
5. Ran the setup again
6. It did the same few checks and eventually asked if I wanted to keep everything – I said yes again
7. This time it completed without error, it took around an hour

So now I had an upgraded PC, and everything seemed OK. Including my Biometric login – I was surprised me as this had been a problem to setup in the past.

Only issue was with my external screen, so went back into the BIOS to disable NVidia Optimus again. This time it did prompt me to re-enter the Bitlocker key. Once this was done I could use external screens with no issues as before.

So a smooth upgrade from our standard Windows 8.1 dev machine image, a good stop gap until our IT team build a Windows 10 image in Systems Center.

If you are using basic PowerShell scripts as opposed to DSC with Release Management there are a few gotcha’s I have found.

## You cannot pass parameters

Lets look at a sample script that we would like to run via Release Manager

param(    $param1 ) write-verbose -verbose "Start"write-verbose -verbose "Got var1 [$var1]"write-verbose -verbose "Got param1 [$param1]"write-verbose -verbose "End" In Release Manager we have the following vNext workflow You can see we are setting two custom values which we intend to use within our script, one is a script parameter (Param1), the other one is just a global variable (Var1). If we do a deployment we get the log Copying recursively from \\store\drops\rm\4583e318-abb2-4f21-9289-9cb0264a3542\152 to C:\Windows\DtlDownloads\ISS vNext Drops succeeded.StartGot var1 [XXXvar1]Got param1 []End You can see the problem,$var1 is set, $param1 is not. Took me a while to get my head around this, the problem is the RM activity’s PSSCriptPath is just that a script path, not a command line that will be executed. Unlike the PowerShell activities in the vNext build tools you don’t have a pair of settings, one for the path to the script and another for the arguments. Here we have no ways to set the command line arguments. Note: The PSConfigurationPath is just for DSC configurations as discussed elsewhere. So in effect the Param1 is not set, as we did not call test -param1 “some value” This means there is no point using parameters in the script you wish to use with RM vNext. But wait, I bet you are thinking ‘I want to run my script externally to Release Manager to test it, and using parameters with validation rules is best practice, I don’t want to loose that advantage The best workaround I have found is to use a wrapper script that takes the variable and makes them parameters, something like this $folder = Split-Path -Parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition&$folder\test.ps1 -param1 $param1 Another Gotcha Note that I need to find the path the wrapper script is running in and use it to build the path to my actual script. If I don’t do this I get that the test.ps1 script can’t be found. After altering my pipeline to use the wrapper and rerunning the deployment I get the log file I wanted Copying recursively from \\store\drops\rm\4583e318-abb2-4f21-9289-9cb0264a3542\160 to C:\Windows\DtlDownloads\ISS vNext Drops succeeded.StartGot var1 [XXXvar1]Got param1 [XXXparam1]End  This is all a bit ugly, but works. Looking forward this appears to not be too much of an issue. The next version of Release Management as shown at Build is based around the vNext TFS build tooling which seems to always allow you to pass true PowerShell command line arguments. So this problem should go away in the not too distant future. ## Don’t write to the console The other big problem is any script that writes or reads from the console. Usually this means a write-host call in a script that causes an error along the lines A command that prompts the user failed because the host program or the command type does not support user interaction. Try a host program that supports user interaction, such as the Windows PowerShell Console or Windows PowerShell ISE, and remove prompt-related commands from command types that do not support user interaction, such as Windows PowerShell workflows. +At C:\Windows\DtlDownloads\ISS vNext Drops\scripts\test.ps1:7 char:1+ Write-Host "hello 1" -ForegroundColor red But also watch out for any CLS calls, that has caught me out. I have found the it can be hard to track down the offending lines, especially if there are PowerShell modules loading modules. The best recommendation is to just use write-verbose and write-error. • write-error if your script has errored. This will let RM know the script has failed, thus failing the deployment – just what we want • write-verbose for any logging Any other form of PowerShell output will not be passed to RM, be warned! You might also notice in my sample script that I am passing the –verbose argument to the write-verbose command, again you have to have this maximal level of logging on for the messages to make it out to the RM logs. Probably a better solution, if you think you might vary the level of logging, is to change the script to set the$VerbosePreference

param(    $param1 )$VerbosePreference ='Continue' # equiv to -verbose
write-verbose "Start"write-verbose "Got var1 [$var1]"write-verbose "Got param1 [$param1]"write-verbose "End"

So hopefully a few pointers to make your deployments a bit smoother

With the release of Visual Studio 2015 there are some significant changes to Visual Studio and TFS licensing, you can find the details of Brian Harry’s blog. These changes can make a serious change in what you need to purchase for different roles, so it could well be worth a look.

If you are providing a path to a custom test adaptor such as nUnit or Chutzpah for a TFS/VSO vNext build e.g. $(Build.SourcesDirectory)\packages, make sure you have no leading whitespace in the data entry form. If you do have a space you will see an error log like this as the adaptor cannot be found as the command line generated is malformed 2015-07-13T16:11:32.8986514Z Executing the powershell script: C:\LR\MMS\Services\Mms\TaskAgentProvisioner\Tools\tasks\VSTest\1.0.16\VSTest.ps1 2015-07-13T16:11:33.0727047Z ##[debug]Calling Invoke-VSTest for all test assemblies 2015-07-13T16:11:33.0756512Z Working folder: C:\a\0549426d 2015-07-13T16:11:33.0777083Z Executing C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\CommonExtensions\Microsoft\TestWindow\vstest.console.exe "C:\a\0549426d\UnitTestDemo\WebApp.Tests\Scripts\mycode.tests.js" /TestAdapterPath: C:\a\0549426d\UnitTestDemo\Chutzpah /logger:trx 2015-07-13T16:11:34.3495987Z Microsoft (R) Test Execution Command Line Tool Version 12.0.30723.0 2015-07-13T16:11:34.3505995Z Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. 2015-07-13T16:11:34.3896000Z ##[error]Error: The /TestAdapterPath parameter requires a value, which is path of a location containing custom test adapters. Example: /TestAdapterPath:c:\MyCustomAdapters 2015-07-13T16:11:36.5808275Z ##[error]Error: The test source file "C:\a\0549426d\UnitTestDemo\Chutzpah" provided was not found. 2015-07-13T16:11:37.0004574Z ##[error]VSTest Test Run failed with exit code: 1 2015-07-13T16:11:37.0094570Z ##[warning]No results found to publish. I have been using Pester for some PowerShell tests. From the command prompt all is good, but I kept getting the error ‘module cannot be loaded because scripts is disabled on this system’ when I tried to run them via the Visual Studio Test Explorer I found the solution on StackOverflow, I had forgotten that Visual Studio is 32bit, so you need to set the 32bit execution policy. Opening the default PowerShell command prompt and and setting the policy only effect the 64Bit instance. 1. Open C:\Windows\SysWOW64\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe 2. Run the command Set-ExecutionPolicy RemoteSigned 3. My tests passed (without restarting Visual Studio) I have been doing some work on vNext Release Management; I managed to waste a good hour today with a stupid error. In vNext process templates you provide a username and password to be used as the Powershell remoting credentials (in the red box below) My Powershell script also took a parameter username, so this was provided as a custom configuration too (the green box). This was the issue. Not unsurprisingly having two parameters with the same name is a problem. You might get away with it if they are the same value (I did on one stage, which caused more confusion), but if they differ (as mine did in my production stage) the last one set wins, which meant my remote Powershell returned the error System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.AggregateException: One or more errors occurred. ---> Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Release.Common.Helpers.OperationFailedException: Permission denied while trying to connect to the target machine Gadila.blackmarble.co.uk on the port:5985 via power shell remoting. Easy to fix once you realise the problem, a logon failure is logged on the target machine in the event log. Just make sure you have unique parameters I will be speaking at Leeds DevOps on the 21st of July on the subject of Desired State Configuration (DSC). ‘In the Windows world, due to its API based architecture, deployment is too often not as simple as copying an EXE and updating a text configuration file. Desired State Configuration is an attempt to ease the pain we suffer in this space. Providing a set of tools that can be leveraged by any set of deployment tools whether in a Windows or heterogeneous environment. In this session we will look at what DSC is, what resource are available and how to write your own’. The event is at the The Node in Leeds, tickets are free and are available over on Eventbrite or meetup.com Many web sites are basically forms over data, so you need to deploy some DB schema and something like a MVC website. Even for this ’bread and butter’ work it is important to have an automated process to avoid human error. Hence the rise in use of release tools to run your DACPAC and MSDeploy packages. In the Microsoft space this might lead to the question of how Desired State Configuration (DSC) can help? I, and others, have posted in the past about how DSC can be used to achieve this type of deployment, but this can be complex and you have to ask is DSC the best way to manage DACPAC and MSDeploy packages? Or is DSC better suited to only the configuration of your infrastructure/OS features? You might ask why would you not want to use DSC, well the most common reason I see is that you need to provide deployment script to end clients who don’t use DSC, or you have just decided want basic PowerShell. Only you will be able to judge which is the best for your systems, but I thought it worth outlining an alternative way to do deployment of these package using Release Management vNext pipelines that does not make use of DSC. ## Background Let us assume we have a system with a SQL server and a IIS web server that have been added to the Release Management vNext environment. These already have SQL and IIS enabled, maybe you used DSC for that? The vNext release template allows you to run either DSC or PowerShell on the machines, we will ignore DSC, so what can you do if you want to use simple PowerShell scripts? ## Where do I put my Scripts? We will place the PowerShell scripts (and maybe any tools they call) under source control such that they end up in the build drops location, thus making it easy for Release Management to find them, and allowing the scripts (and tools) to be versioned. ## Deploying a DACPAC The script I have been using to deploy DACPACs is as follows # find the script folder$folder = Split-Path -parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.DefinitionWrite-Verbose "Deploying DACPAC$SOURCEFILE using script in '$folder'"&$folder\sqlpackage.exe /Action:Publish /SourceFile:$folder\..\$SOURCEFILE /TargetServerName:$TARGETSERVERNAME /TargetDatabaseName:$TARGETDATABASENAME | Write-Verbose -Verbose

Note that:

1. First it finds the folder it is running in, this is the easiest way to find other resource I need
2. The only way any logging will end up in the Release Management logs is if is logged at the verbose level i.e. write-verbose “your message” –verbose
3. I have used a simple & my.exe to execute my command, but pass the output via the write-verbose cmdlet to make sure we see the results. The alternative would be to use invoke-process
4. SQLPACKAGE.EXE (and its associated DLLs) are located in the same SCRIPTS folder as the PowerShell script and are under source control. Of course you could make sure any tools you need are already installed on the target machine.

I pass the three parameters need for the strips as custom configuration

Remember that you don’t have to be the SQL server to run SQLPACKAGE.EXE, it can be run remotely (that is why in the screen shot above the ServerName is ISS IIS8 not SQL as you might expect)

## Deploying a MSDeploy Package

The script I use to deploy the WebDeploy package this is as follows

function Update-ParametersFile{    param    (        $paramFilePath,$paramsToReplace    )
write-verbose "Updating parameters file '$paramFilePath'" -verbose$content = get-content $paramFilePath$paramsToReplace.GetEnumerator() | % {        Write-Verbose "Replacing value for key '$($_.Key)'" -Verbose        $content =$content.Replace($_.Key,$_.Value)    }    set-content -Path $paramFilePath -Value$content
}
# the script folder$folder = Split-Path -parent$MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definitionwrite-verbose "Deploying Website '$package' using script in '$folder'" -verbose
Update-ParametersFile -paramFilePath "$folder\..\_PublishedWebsites\$($package)_Package\$package.SetParameters.xml" -paramsToReplace @{      "__DataContext__" = $datacontext "__SiteName__" =$siteName      "__Domain__" = $Domain "__AdminGroups__" =$AdminGroups}

## Fixing the 500 error

The 500 error was stranger. Turns out the issue was the registration of our TFS server in Release Management.

Using the dialogs in the RM client we has registered our TFS server, this had generated the URL https://tfs.domain.com:443/tfs. If we ran the InitiateReleaseFromBuild.ps1 script with this URL set as a parameter we got the 500 error, the RM logs showed the workflow could not start. Eventually we realised it was because RM thought it could not access the TFS server. So the problem was that at some point  between the script being run and the RM server processing the URL the :443 had been removed; presumably because this is the default for HTTPS and some layer was being ‘helpful’. This meant that the RM server was trying to string match the URL https://tfs.domain.com/tfs against https://tfs.domain.com:443/tfs which failed, hence the workflow failed.

The fix was to edit the TFS registration in RM to remove the port number, leave the field empty (not that obvious as the dialog completes this field for you when you select HTTPS)

Once this was done the URL matching worked and the release pipeline triggered as expected.

Whilst setting up Application Insights on one of our web sites I hit a problem. The target site appeared to be working OK, but if I setup a ping test it failed.

Digging into the failure, as with much of Application Insights just keep clicking to go deeper, I found the issue was that a CSS file was failing to load.

Presumably on this Umbraco site the CSS file is meant to be loaded for the site but none of the styles are actually used, hence the site renders OK.

The fix was to make sure the video.css file was present on the server. So Application Insights found a problem with a production system – just as it is meant to!

So it is important to remember that the ping test is not the simple thing I thought it was, it is actually a full page load, making sure that only 200 OK responses are seen.