<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Mat Steeples - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Tip: System.Data.Entity and ClickOnce Deployment Issue</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/archive/2008/08/12/your-clickonce-clients-complain-of-a-missing-system-data-entity-reference-in-the-gac.aspx#13511</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:59:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2247bbd-a8ea-45d7-b15f-e334232e9347:13511</guid><dc:creator>Guillermo G. Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was developing a Windows forms application in .net framework 3.5, and I needed to include ClickOnce&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=13511" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IIS7 on 64 bit Windows</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/archive/2008/02/04/iis7-on-64-bit-windows.aspx#12355</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:55:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2247bbd-a8ea-45d7-b15f-e334232e9347:12355</guid><dc:creator>PB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Were you able to figure this out?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12355" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: IIS7 on 64 bit Windows</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/archive/2008/02/04/iis7-on-64-bit-windows.aspx#12351</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:39:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2247bbd-a8ea-45d7-b15f-e334232e9347:12351</guid><dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mat, I&amp;#39;ve been searching Microsoft and everything was pointing to isapi.dll is the wrong directory. &amp;nbsp;Nothing from Microsoft mentioned application pooling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I now have the web running on this machine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bruce&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12351" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>C# 3 (aka .NET 3.5, Microsoft Visual Studio 2008)</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/archive/2008/04/23/anonymous-methods.aspx#11791</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:34:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2247bbd-a8ea-45d7-b15f-e334232e9347:11791</guid><dc:creator>Mat Steeples</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I started a series over a week ago about the new language features in C# 3 and the capabilities of version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11791" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>C# 3 (aka .NET 3.5, Microsoft Visual Studio 2008)</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/archive/2008/04/14/extension-methods-and-interfaces.aspx#11790</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:33:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2247bbd-a8ea-45d7-b15f-e334232e9347:11790</guid><dc:creator>Mat Steeples</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I started a series over a week ago about the new language features in C# 3 and the capabilities of version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11790" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: 10 x 5 != 50...</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/archive/2008/02/04/10-x-5-50.aspx#10797</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:02:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2247bbd-a8ea-45d7-b15f-e334232e9347:10797</guid><dc:creator>Jon Fowler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Decimal compared to int? Does 50m work?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10797" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: String Performance</title><link>http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/blogs/msteeples/archive/2007/12/27/string-performance.aspx#10222</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:26:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2247bbd-a8ea-45d7-b15f-e334232e9347:10222</guid><dc:creator>Granville Barnett</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you look at the MSIL when you use the add overloaded operator for string concats on the same line then you will see that the string has indeed been optimized by the C# compiler, I believe this is true for all compilers VB.NET, C++/CLI all beit there is a slight difference between the latter and aforementioned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.blackmarble.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10222" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>